Petitioner challenges a determination withholding one year of good time allowance based upon his failure to complete two recommended treatment programs. Inasmuch as petitioner was released from prison in March 2005 following the expiration of his maximum term of imprisonment, the appeal must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Eades v. Duncan, 307 AD2d 503; Matter of Ferro v. Luvera, 288 AD2d 735). We reject petitioner's contention that an exception to the mootness doctrine is presented.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.