AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of GEORGE GITTENS, Appellant, v. MICHELE CHIN-ON, Respondent.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The record reflects that on March 9, 2004, the father consented to the modification of the prior order of visitation dated August 8, 2003. As such, the appeal from the order dated March 9, 2004, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order entered upon the consent of the appealing party, since a party who consents to an order is not aggrieved thereby ( see CPLR 5511; Matter of Cooper v. Administration for Children Servs., 293 AD2d 605; Matter of Hartnett v. Hartnett, 242 AD2d 535; Goodman v. Goodman, 150 AD2d 636).

Moreover, the appeal from the order dated June 22, 2004, is also dismissed, as no appeal lies as of right from a nonfinal order in a visitation proceeding ( see Family Ct Act § 1112), and leave to appeal has not been granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF GITTENS v. MICHELE CHIN-ON
(Jun 20, 2005)