Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DONOVAN JONES NEHA and DION LAMY, Defendants.

ORDER

JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Donovan Jones Neha's Motion to Exclude Evidence Under Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, filed February 7, 2005 (Doc. 45), and on Defendant Donovan Neha's Motion to Sever, filed February 7, 2005 (Doc. 49). The Court held a hearing on these motions on April 20, 2005. Consistent with the Court's ruling at the hearing on this motion, and for the reasons given at the time of the hearing, the Court will deny these motions without prejudice. The United States must produce a redacted statement to Defendant Donovan Neha and Defendant Dion Lamy within ten days of the hearing. If either party takes issue with the redacted statement, he may renew his motion with the Court.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Donovan Neha's Motion to Exclude Evidence Under Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and Neha's Motion to Sever is dismissed without prejudice.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. NEHA
(Jun 20, 2005)