AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MILBRANDT CO., INC., Appellant, v. JOHN W. GRIFFIN et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to compel the defendant John M. Glover Agency to comply with discovery demands is dismissed as academic ( see Milbrandt Co., Inc. v. Griffin, 19 AD3d 662 [decided herewith]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents.

"The supervision of discovery, and the setting of reasonable terms and conditions for disclosure, are within the sound discretion of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's discretion is broad because it is familiar with the action before it, and its exercise should not be disturbed on appeal unless it was improvidently exercised" ( Provident Life Cas. Ins. Co. v. Brittenham, 284 AD2d 518; see Setsuo Ito v. Dryvit Sys., 5 AD3d 735). The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to compel the defendant John W. Griffin to comply with discovery demands.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MILBRANDT CO., INC. v. GRIFFIN
(Jun 27, 2005)