AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN DOE et al., Respondents, v. CHURCH OF ST. CHRISTOPHER et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, the appellants failed to demonstrate their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see Doe v. Whitney, 8 AD3d 610; Well v. Yeshiva Rambam, 300 AD2d 580; Kenneth R. v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, 229 AD2d 159, lv dismissed 91 NY2d 848, cert denied 522 US 967). Thus, the motion was properly denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DOE v. CHURCH OF ST. CHRISTOPHER
(Jun 27, 2005)