AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PHOENIX SOUND, INC., Doing Business as SOUNDFACTORY, et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

With regard to claims predating February 7, 2003, there is no indication when they accrued, and petitioners did not sufficiently set forth the manner in which such claims arose to allow respondent adequately to investigate and evaluate their merits ( see General Municipal Law § 50-e [a]; [2]; Brown v. City of New York, 95 NY2d 389). The conclusory claims of negligence in hiring, training, retention and supervision were likewise too vague to provide respondent adequate notice for proper investigation.

We have considered respondent's remaining contentions and find them without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PHOENIX SOUND, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Jun 30, 2005)