AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PAUL TUCKER, Appellant.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk and a sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). County Court properly adopted the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders in determining defendant's risk level ( see People v. Billingsley, 6 AD3d 1170, lv denied 3 NY3d 605). "The case summary, together with the presentence investigation report and information presented at the hearing, provided clear and convincing proof supporting defendant's presumptive classification as a [level three] risk . . . sex offender" ( People v. Ahlers, 10 AD3d 770, 771, lv denied 4 NY3d 704; see People v. Mitchell, 300 AD2d 377, 377-378, lv denied 99 NY2d 510).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. TUCKER
(Jul 1, 2005)