Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Da v. d FITZPATRICK, Appellant,

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Fitzpatrick appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. In his sole point on appeal, Mr. Fitzpatrick contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to depose two witnesses before trial.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FITZPATRICK v. STATE
(Jul 5, 2005)