AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

JOHN F. REUTEMANN, JR., et al. v. LEWIS AQUATECH INCORPORATED.

ORDER

DEBORAH CHASANOW, District Judge

For the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion, it is this 5th day of July, 2005, by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, ORDERED that:

1. The motion of Defendant Lewis Aquatech, Inc., for summary judgment against Plaintiffs John R. Reutemann, Jr., and Antoinette Reutemann (paper no. 27), BE, and the same hereby IS, GRANTED IN PART as to the negligence claims AND DENIED IN PART as to the breach of contract claims;

2. Judgment BE, and the same hereby IS, ENTERED in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs on the negligence claims;

3. A telephone scheduling conference will be held Monday, July 25, 2005, at 9:00 a.m. The court will place the call to counsel who are to advise in advance of the number at which they can be reached;

4. Counsel are directed to file a jointly prepared and updated status report, no later than July 18, 2005, with the information concerning ADR, consent to proceed before a magistrate judge, and estimated length of trial; and

5. The Clerk will transmit copies of the Memorandum Opinion and this Order to counsel for the parties.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

REUTEMANN v. LEWIS AQUATECH INCORPORATED
(Jul 5, 2005)