Ordered that the appeal of the defendant Eric Bluestone is dismissed as abandoned ( see 22 NYCRR 670.8 [c], [e]); and it is further,
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which, upon reargument, granted summary judgment to the plaintiff on the theory of money had and received, and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the defendants Gem Community Management, Inc., Joseph A. Bahnatka, and Emerald Management Corporation, with costs to the defendants Gem Community Management, Inc., Joseph A. Bahnatka, and Emerald Management Corporation payable by the plaintiff.
A motion for reargument is not designed to provide an unsuccessful party with successive opportunities to present arguments different from those originally presented ( see McGill v. Goldman, 261 AD2d 593, 594; Matter of Mayer v. National Arts Club, 192 AD2d 863, 865; Foley v. Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568). Here, the plaintiff did not originally plead a cause of action sounding in money had and received.
The remaining contentions of the defendants Gem Community Management, Inc., Joseph A. Bahnatka, and Emerald Management Corporation are without merit.