Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision ( see Schicchi v. Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,
Ordered that the order and resettled judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents.
The "new information" that the petitioners brought to the respondents' attention after the issuance of the final environmental impact statement (hereinafter the EIS) was not "of the type that would require" further environmental review of the project at issue ( Matter of Town of Pleasant Val. v. Town of Poughkeepsie Planning Bd., 289 AD2d 583, 583). Accordingly, contrary to the petitioners' contention, the respondents' determination not to prepare a supplemental EIS ( see 6 NYCRR 617.9 [a] [7] [i] [b]) was neither arbitrary and capricious, nor an abuse of discretion ( see Matter of Haberman v. City of Long Beach, 307 AD2d 313, 314).
The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.