Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

JAMES TODD KELLEY, Plaintiff, v. EDISON TOWNSHIP, MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, DET. FRED LACIK, II, LT. MICHAEL PALKO, DET. JEFF ABRAMS, SGT. CHRIS ENGRAM, PTLM. JEFF DIAKUNCZAK, PTLM. BRIAN MIECKOWSKI, Defendants. DET. JEFF ABRAMS, et al. Third Party Plaintiff,

ORDER

WILLIAM H. WALLS, District Judge

ORDERED that Defendant Chris Engram's motion for summary judgment is DENIED on Counts One and Two and GRANTED on Counts Three through Eight; Defendant Middlesex County Prosecutor's Office's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED on Counts One through Five and then GRANTED in part and DENIED in part on Counts Six through Eight;

Defendant Fred Lacik's motion for summary judgment is DENIED on Counts One, Two, Six, Seven and Eight, and GRANTED on Counts Three through Five; Defendant Michael Palko's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED on Counts One through Six and Count Eight and DENIED on Count Seven; Defendant Edison Township's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED on Counts One through Five and DENIED on Counts Six through Eight; Defendant Jeff Diakunczak's motion for summary judgment is DENIED on Counts One, Two, Six and Eight and GRANTED on Counts Three through Five and Count Seven; Defendant Brian Mieckowski's motion for summary judgment is DENIED on Counts One, Two, Six and Eight and GRANTED on Counts Three through Five and Count Seven; and Defendant Jeff Abrams's motion for summary judgment is DENIED on Counts One, Two, Six, Seven and Eight, and GRANTED on Counts Three through Five.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KELLEY v. EDISON TOWNSHIP
(Jul 19, 2005)