Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

MICHAEL SCHAPER, Plaintiff, v. MARK EVERSON, indi

ORDER

PHILIP PRO, District Judge

On July 27, 2004, the United States filed a Motion to Dismiss (#6). Although Plaintiff was advised of the requirements of filing a response in view of Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988) and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Circ. 1998), a review of the Court's file shows that to date Plaintiff has failed to do so. Therefore, pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d) of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Plaintiff consents to the granting of Defendant's Motion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant United States' Motion to Dismiss (#6) is granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHAPER v. EVERSON
(Oct 13, 2004)