AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THOMAS MAZZA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT MARCELLO, Defendant. DONALD FRIEDMAN, P.C., Nonparty Appellant; JACOBY MEYERS, LLP, Nonparty Respondent.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The issue of apportionment of an attorney's fee is controlled by the circumstances and equities of each particular case, and the trial court is in the best position to assess such factors ( see Juste v. New York City Tr. Auth., 5 AD3d 736; Ebrahimian v. Long Is. R.R., 269 AD2d 488). Contrary to the appellant's contention, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding the former attorney 40% of the total legal fee, as such fee was based upon the amount of time spent on the case, and the nature of the work performed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MAZZA v. MARCELLO
(Jul 25, 2005)