Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Page SHUFF, Petitioner, v. CITY OF OPA LOCKA, and Serenity Lakes, Ltd., Respondents.

ROTHENBERG, Judge.

The circuit court, acting in its appellate capacity, denied the petitioner's petition for writ of certiorari. Our review is, therefore, limited to whether the circuit court denied the petitioner procedural due process and whether the decision is a departure from the essential requirements of the law. See Ortega v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 847 So.2d 994 (Fla. 3d DCA), review dismissed, 859 So.2d 516 (Fla. 2003). While the circuit court issued a per curium denial of the petition for writ of certiorari, after a review of the record we conclude that petitioner has been afforded procedural due process and the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity did not depart from the essential requirements of the law. See Miami-Dade County v. Omnipoint Holdings, Inc., 863 So.2d 195, 199 (Fla. 2003) (explaining that a ruling constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of the law when it amounts to a violation of a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice).

Petition denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHUFF v. CITY OF OPA LOCKA
(Jul 27, 2005)