AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of ANDREW R., an Infant. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent; ILMARS R., Appellant.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined, upon clear and convincing evidence, that the father abandoned the subject child during the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the petition. The father did not visit or contact the child, or establish that he was unable to do so, and neither the respondent nor the foster parents prevented or discouraged him from contacting the child during that period ( see Social Services Law § 384-b; Matter of Julius P., 63 NY2d 477; Matter of Annette B., 2 AD3d 721; Matter of Lee P., 304 AD2d 760; Matter of Alexa Ray R., 276 AD2d 703; see also Matter of Shaolin G., 277 AD2d 312). Furthermore, the Family Court properly concluded that termination of the father's parental right was in the child's best interests ( see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 148).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW R
(Aug 1, 2005)