AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE AMADOR, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

The Supreme Court correctly found that the ruse used by the police to convince the defendant to leave his home was not coercive or so fundamentally unfair as to deny due process ( see Payton v. New York, 445 US 573, 576; People v. Minley, 68 NY2d 952; People v. Tarsia, 50 NY2d 1, 11; People v. Rosario, 186 AD2d 598; People v. Ross, 158 AD2d 560, 561; People v. Hill, 138 AD2d 629; cf. People v. Jefferson, 43 AD2d 112, 113).

The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or do not require reversal.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. AMADOR
(Oct 4, 2004)