Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

GREGORIO C. FUNTANILLA, JR. Petitioner, v. CHERYL PLILER Respondent.

ORDER

MORRISON ENGLAND, District Judge

July 26, 2005, the court dismissed this action and the clerk of the court duly entered judgment. Petitioner seeks relief from judgment upon grounds asserted in his untimely objections to the April 27, 2005, findings and recommendations.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b):

On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or a party's legal representative from a final judgment, order or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); (3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.

Petitioner does not demonstrate he is entitled to relief from judgment. Accordingly, petitioner's August 5, 2005, request is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FUNTANILLA v. PLILER
(Sep 1, 2005)