AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

PRIYANK SHAH v. COLLECTO, INC., et al.

ORDER

DEBORAH CHASANOW, District Judge

For the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion, it is this 12th day of September, 2005, by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, ORDERED that:

1. The motion of Plaintiff to stay decision pending discovery (paper no. 20), BE, and the same hereby IS, DENIED;

2. The motion of Plaintiff for leave to file a surreply (paper no. 19) BE, and the same hereby IS, GRANTED in part as to the statute of limitations and DENIED otherwise;

3. The motion of Collecto, Inc. to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment (paper no. 9) BE, and the same hereby IS, GRANTED;

4. Judgment BE, and the same hereby IS, ENTERED in favor of Collecto, Inc. and against Priyank Shah on all claims; and

5. The Clerk will transmit copies of the Memorandum Opinion and this Order to counsel for the parties.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHAH v. COLLECTO, INC. (D.Md. 2005)
(Sep 12, 2005)