AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of HARRY MENDEZ, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Ser

Petitioner was found guilty following a tier III disciplinary hearing of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting unauthorized exchange and unauthorized legal assistance. On administrative appeal, the determination was modified to the extent of dismissing the charge of unauthorized legal assistance. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report and the testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Alvarez v. Goord, 17 AD3d 945, 945; Matter of Sanders v. Goord, 275 AD2d 842, 842-843). While the correction officer who issued the report did not witness the actual unauthorized exchange, the record reveals that he gained personal knowledge of the incident by investigating and ascertaining the underlying facts after they occurred ( see 7 NYCRR 251-3.1 [b]; Matter of Howard v. Goord, 9 AD3d 778, 778, lv dismissed 3 NY3d 764; Matter of Bonacci v. Goord, 3 AD3d 639, 639).

We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions, including his procedural claims, and find them to be without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF MENDEZ v. GOORD
(Sep 22, 2005)