The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to give defendant a second chance to complete a drug treatment program after he originally absconded, in direct violation of the terms of his agreement and with the express understanding that if he did so he would be sentenced to 4½ to 9 years. Defendant's constitutional argument is unpreserved ( see People v. Ruz, 70 NY2d 942, 943; People v. Ingram, 67 NY2d 897, 899), and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice. Were we to reach this claim, we would reject it.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.