AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH JUNG, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenge concerning the Supreme Court's charge on the issue of justification is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant did not object to the charge as given or request a supplemental charge ( see CPL 470.50; People v Moultrie, 6 AD3d 730; People v. Santos, 280 AD2d 561). Under the circumstances of this case, we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see People v. Holmes, 12 AD3d 532; cf. People v. Feuer, 11 AD3d 633).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. JUNG
(Oct 3, 2005)