AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

GLENDA KAY BUCHANAN, Plaintiff, v. LT./WATCH COMMANDER JEFF COMPTON, ET AL., Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES JONES, District Judge

The plaintiff has responded as directed by the court with a statement of the particulars of any alleged liability of defendants Stan Young, Jabe, and Johnson under Counts One and Three of the Complaint, and a statement of the particulars of any alleged violation of due process by each such defendant as to Count Two.

Considering such responses, I find that the plaintiff has failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted as to such defendants as to such counts, for the reasons set forth in the defendants' Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Counts One, Two and Three are dismissed as to defendants Stan Young, John Jabe, and Gene M. Johnson.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BUCHANAN v. LT./WATCH COMMANDER JEFF COMPTON
(Oct 3, 2005)