AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GERALDINE BARILE, an indi v. dual; ALFREDO PONCE, an indi

ORDER AND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE

BARRY MOSKOWITZ, District Judge

On July 12, 2005, Defendant Boston Market Corporation filed two (2) motions: (i) Defendant Boston Market Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Eighth Claim For Relief Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6); and (ii) Defendant Boston Market Corporation's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f).

The parties hereby stipulate that the hearing date for the aforementioned motions be continued from October 21, 2005 to a hearing date of no earlier than November 4, 2005. The parties further understand that no appearance will be required on the new hearing date on any of these motions, but that the Court may, thereafter schedule a hearing on one or more of these motions.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The parties having stipulated, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that October 21, 2005, hearing in the above-captioned matter on Defendant Boston Market Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Eighth Claim For Relief Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and Defendant Boston Marker Corporation's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f), is hereby continued from October 21, 2005 to November 18, 2005 at 11:00 a.m./p.m. It is further ordered that no oral argument will be heard on these motions on November, 18, 2005. However, the Court may thereafter schedule oral argument on one or more of these motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARILE v. BOSTON MARKET CORPORATION
(Oct 3, 2005)