BROWN v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

6647.

Attorney(S)

Law Office of Harry Kresky, New York (Harry Kresky of counsel), for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elizabeth I. Freedman of counsel), for respondents.

Judges

David Friedman

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

JACK BROWN, Plaintiff, and DENNIS MULLIGAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Municipalities are generally immune from tort liability when their employees perform discretionary acts involving the exercise of reasoned judgment, except in those cases where plaintiffs establish that they had a "special relationship" with the municipality giving rise to a duty enforceable in tort ( see Pelaez v. Seide, 2 NY3d 186; Lauer v. City of New York, 95 NY2d 95, 99; Tango v. Tulevech, 61 NY2d 34). Inasmuch as the complained-of conduct by municipal employees was discretionary and there is no allegation justifying an inference that there was a "special relationship" between plaintiff and the City, the complaint failed to state a cognizable claim for relief as against the municipal defendants.

JACK BROWN, Plaintiff, and DENNIS MULLIGAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Comments