AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MARY K. HENNING, Appellant-Respondent, v. ROBERT A. RITZ, Respondent-Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence before the Supreme Court was sufficient to establish that the plaintiff placed the marking purporting to be the signature of a Family Court Judge on the subject document, which constituted civil and criminal contempt ( see Judiciary Law § 750 [A] [6]; § 753 [A] [2]; Matter of McCormick v Axelrod, 59 NY2d 574; Ketchum v. Edwards, 153 NY 534; Dalessio v. Kressler, 6 AD3d 57, 65-66).

The parties' remaining contentions are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HENNING v. RITZ
(Oct 11, 2005)