AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

CURTIS J. GRANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, Defendant.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REHEARING

LAWRENCE ZATKOFF, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's August 11, 2005 Motion for Rehearing. Pursuant to E.D. MICH. LR 7.1(g)(2), no response is permitted. By his Motion for Rehearing, Plaintiff challenges the Court's June 16, 2005 Opinion and Order dismissing Plaintiff's case.

A motion for rehearing is governed by E.D. MICH.LR 7.1(g)(3), which states, "the court will not grant motions for rehearing or reconsideration that merely present the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication." The motion "must be filed within 10 days after entry of the judgment or order." Id. at 7.1(g)(2). The Court finds that Plaintiff's Motion for Rehearing is not timely, and merely presents the same issues that were already addressed by the Court in its June 16, 2005 Opinion and Order. Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion for Rehearing is HEREBY DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GRANDERSON v. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
(Oct 11, 2005)