Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, his constitutional right to be present at a material stage of the trial was not violated ( see People v. Morales, 80 NY2d 450, 455-457; People v. Babb, 226 AD2d 469, 470; People v. Chicas, 204 AD2d 476, 476-477).
The Supreme Court properly admitted into evidence photographs depicting the shirt worn by the murder victim ( see People v Pobliner, 32 NY2d 356, 369-370, cert denied 416 US 905; People v. Collic, 285 AD2d 514, 515; People v DeBerry, 234 AD2d 470, 470-471).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not warrant reversal.