AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

EVELYN TYME, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants, and ARTHUR J. SCHLOERB, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On this record, the defendant Arthur J. Schloerb failed to establish his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see Obie v. Catsimatidis, 10 AD3d 569; Brown v O'Connor, 193 AD2d 1088). Moreover, the Supreme Court correctly determined that granting summary judgment before the beginning of discovery would have been premature given the nature of the allegations made in the complaint ( see CPLR 3212 [f]; Sportiello v. City of New York, 6 AD3d 421, 422).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TYME v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Oct 11, 2005)