AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARVIN WARD, Appellant.

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. When defendant gave highly suspicious answers to an officer's lawful request for information about a loud crashing noise in the immediate vicinity, including answers that were inconsistent with the officer's own observations, the encounter escalated to the point where the officer had a founded suspicion that criminality was afoot, which justified the officer in asking defendant whether he had any weapons on him ( see People v. De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 223; People v. McPherson, 286 AD2d 616, lv denied 97 NY2d 685).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. WARD
(Oct 20, 2005)