Plaintiff's allegations, if accepted, would convincingly establish her claim that defendant misrepresented itself as an accredited educational institution, contravening a strong public policy of the State as reflected by the Education Law. Plaintiff also makes a strong showing that a trial in Tokyo would be so impracticable and inconvenient that she would be deprived of her day in court. Under the circumstances, the IAS court properly declined to enforce the clause in the parties' contract selecting Tokyo as the forum ( see The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 US 1, 15, 16-17; Premium Risk Group v. Legion Ins. Co., 294 AD2d 345, 346). We have considered and rejected defendant's other arguments.