Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

SEAFORD ET AL., Appellees, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals on the issue raised in appellant's Proposition of Law No. IV is reversed on the authority of Hess v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 106 Ohio St.3d 389, 2005-Ohio-5408, ___ N.E.2d ___, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of Hess.

RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR and O'DONNELL, JJ., concur.

MOYER, C.J., and LANZINGER, J., dissent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SEAFORD v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
(Oct 26, 2005)