Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Howard MOSS, Petitioner, v. Patricia L. MOSS, Respondent.

CANTERO, J.

We have for review Moss v. Moss, 901 So.2d 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), which cites to and certifies the same question of great public importance as Lashkajani v. Lashkajani, 855 So.2d 87 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), quashed, 911 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 2005). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3)-(4), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1981).

This Court recently quashed Lashkajani and answered the certified question in the affirmative. See Lashkajani v. Lashkajani, 911 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 2005). Accordingly, the Court has determined that it should summarily accept jurisdiction in Moss. It is thus ordered that the petition for review in Moss is granted; that decision is quashed; and the matter is remanded for reconsideration in light of this Court's decision in Lashkajani.

No motion for rehearing will be entertained by the Court.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MOSS v. MOSS
(Oct 27, 2005)