Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of murder in the second degree ( see Penal Law § 125.25). As the defendant made only a generalized motion for a trial order of dismissal, this contention is not preserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 NY2d 10). The defendant's motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30, in which he raised essentially the same argument that he now raises on appeal, was not sufficient to preserve this contention for appellate review ( see People v. Padro, 75 NY2d 820; People v. Adams, 281 AD2d 486). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).
The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.