MEDINA v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSP. CORP

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

2004-06945.

Attorney(S)

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Larry A. Sonnenshein and Sharyn Rootenberg of counsel), for appellant. Fitzgerald Fitzgerald, P.C., Yonkers, N.Y. (John E. Fitzgerald, John M. Daly, Eugene S.R. Pagano, Delsia G. Marshall, and Jason C. Molesso of counsel), for respondent.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

2004-06945.

Attorney(S)

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Larry A. Sonnenshein and Sharyn Rootenberg of counsel), for appellant. Fitzgerald Fitzgerald, P.C., Yonkers, N.Y. (John E. Fitzgerald, John M. Daly, Eugene S.R. Pagano, Delsia G. Marshall, and Jason C. Molesso of counsel), for respondent.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

ANDREW MEDINA, Respondent, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION (WOODHULL MEDICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH CENTER), Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the cross motion of the defendant New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (Woodhull Medical and Mental Health Center) which was for leave to renew, as it was not based upon new facts which would have changed the prior determination ( see CPLR 2221 [e] [2]; Kaufman v. Kunis, 14 AD3d 542; cf. Schwartz v. Montefiore Hosp. Med. Ctr., 305 AD2d 174, 176).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

ANDREW MEDINA, Respondent, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION (WOODHULL MEDICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH CENTER), Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Comments