Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JOSE ARAGON, Plaintiff, v. N. HIRSCH, et al., Defendants.

ORDER RE: FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS (#47)

ROBERT COYLE, District Judge

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On September 29, 2005, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on September 29, 200, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants Yarborough, Carter, Close, Pearson and Patton are dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ARAGON v. HIRSCH
(Nov 1, 2005)