AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

CORNELIUS TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. S. WINGROVE, et al., Defendants. CORNELIUS TUCKER, Plaintiff,

ORDER

JOSEPH GOODWIN, District Judge

These actions were referred to the Honorable Stanley, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and has recommended that the court FIND that the Plaintiff's allegations are indecipherable, indisputably meritless, and are based upon factual assertions which are irrational, fanciful and delusional. The Magistrate Judge also recommended that the court FIND that there is no basis for jurisdiction over any of the Defendants. The court construes both of the motions as timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendation. Having reviewed the petitioner's objections de novo, the court FINDS that they are without merit.

Therefore, the court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and orders judgment consistent with the findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the court DISMISSES the actions for lack of jurisdiction.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TUCKER v. WINGROVE
(Nov 1, 2005)