Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by directing that all sentences run concurrently with each other; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and conspiracy in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).
The People demonstrated that the wiretap investigation was carried out with the appropriate procedures in place to minimize interception of nonpertinent communications ( see CPL 700.30; People v. Floyd, 41 NY2d 245, 250). The defendant failed to rebut this showing, and thus, the court correctly denied that branch of his motion which was to suppress the audiotapes produced from the investigation ( see People v. Floyd, supra). Moreover, the court properly determined that certain audiotapes were sufficiently audible to warrant their admission into evidence ( see People v. Wilson, 207 AD2d 463, 464; People v. Robinson, 158 AD2d 628; cf. People v. Mincey, 64 AD2d 615).
The sentences imposed were excessive to the extent indicated.
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.