Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Interest of C.R. and S.R., Children. Mary Rothman, Petitioner and Appellee v. C.R. and S.R., Children, and their parents, A.H., f/k/a A.R., and S.R., Respondents. A.H., f/k/a A.R., Respondent and Appellant.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] A.H. has appealed from an order terminating her parental rights to C.R. and S.R., alleging that the juvenile court's findings that deprivation of the children would continue, that there would be substantial harm to the children if termination were not ordered, and that Bottineau County Social Services had made a reasonable effort to reunite the family were clearly erroneous. The order is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE C.R
(Nov 9, 2005)