Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Ke

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Kevin Deon Moore appeals from a judgment of conviction for attempted murder. On appeal, Moore argues the trial court erred in not allowing him to withdraw his guilty plea prior to sentencing.

[¶ 2] On February 23, 2005, Moore plead guilty to attempted murder as part of a plea agreement in which the State agreed to drop terrorizing charges against him. On March 24, 2005, Moore moved to withdraw the plea. The trial court denied Moore's motion, and Moore was sentenced to forty years in the North Dakota Department of Corrections with fifteen years suspended.

[¶ 3] The trial court's judgment of conviction is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and the trial court did not abuse its discretion. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶ 4] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. MOORE
(Nov 9, 2005)