AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROB H. HOAG, Appellant.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65), defendant contends that he should have been afforded youthful offender status. Defendant failed to preserve his contention for our review ( see People v. Thompson, 16 AD3d 603; People v. Stalker, 307 AD2d 765, lv denied 100 NY2d 645), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see CPL 470.15 [a]). Contrary to defendant's further contention, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HOAG
(Nov 10, 2005)