AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of GLEN WALSH, Respondent, v. MELISSA BADICK, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Custody matters are within the discretion of the Family Court, and its findings should be accorded great deference on appeal since it was in the best position to evaluate the testimony, character, and sincerity of the parties ( see Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 173-174; Matter of Canazon v. Canazon, 215 AD2d 652; Klat v. Klat, 176 AD2d 922, 923). As there is a sound and substantial basis in the record for the Family Court's determination, it should not be disturbed ( see Matter of Rory H. v. Mary M., 13 AD3d 373).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF WALSH v. BADICK
(Nov 14, 2005)