AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD SPOTARDS, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenge to the validity of his plea is unpreserved for appellate review since it was not raised in the County Court ( see People v. Clarke, 93 NY2d 904, 905; People v. Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637; People v. Coles, 240 AD2d 419). In any event, the defendant's claim that his plea was not knowing, voluntarily, and intelligent because it resulted from his counsel's failure to advise him that he would be sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender cannot be reviewed on direct appeal since it is based on matter which is dehors the record ( see People v. Reels, 17 AD3d 488, 489; People v. Villacreses, 12 AD3d 624, 626). The defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is likewise based on matter which is dehors the record and, thus, cannot be reviewed on direct appeal ( see People v. Reels, supra; People v. Villacreses, supra).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SPOTARDS
(Nov 21, 2005)