AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN REM TAX FORECLOSURE ACTION NO. 44. PYSA REALTY CORP., Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Petitioner's conclusory denial of receipt of notice of the foreclosure action was insufficient to rebut the presumption of receipt raised by the deed conveying title to the City ( see In Rem Tax Foreclosure Action No. 44, Borough of Bronx, 2 AD3d 241). Moreover, here, the presumption of receipt became conclusive when, four months after entry of final judgment, petitioner had not yet instituted proceedings to set aside the deed ( see Administrative Code of City of NY § 11-412.1 [h]). We note as well that petitioner has not substantiated its claim that the judgment of foreclosure was erroneously premised upon miscalculated delinquent tax assessments.

We have reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PYSA REALTY CORP. v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Nov 22, 2005)