Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

DOUGLAS TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM S. STICKMAN, et al., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

TERRENCE McVERRY, District Judge

The Plaintiff's complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on December 17, 2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Francis X. Caiazza for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on November 7, 2005, recommended that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be denied. Service was made on the Plaintiff by First Class United States Mail delivered to the State Correctional Institution at Rockview, Rockview, Pennsylvania where he is incarcerated. No Objections have been filed.

After of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2005,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 24) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Caiazza (Doc. 32) dated November 7, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TUCKER v. STICKMAN
(Dec 1, 2005)