Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ALLIANCE FOR DISABLED IN ACTION, INC. (ADA), A NEW JERSEY NOT-FOR-PROFITCORPORATION, ON ITS OWN BEHALF AND ON BEHALF OF THE CLASS,Plaintiff-Respondent AND Cross-Appellant, v. RENAISSANCE ENTERPRISES,INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION AND RENAISSANCE TERRACE, INC., A NEW JERSEYCORPORATION, Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Respondents, AND SALKINGROUP, INC.; RENAISSANCE VILLAGE I, A CONDOMINIUM, A NEW JERSEYNOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION; AND THE RENAISSANCE AT NORTH BRUNSWICK MASTERASSOCIATION, A NEW JERSEY NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION, Defendants, ANDCONSTRUCTION OFFICIAL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BRUNSWICK,Defendant-Cross-Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in written per curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 371 N.J.Super. 409, 853 A.2d 334 (2004).

For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE, and RIVERASOTO — 7.

Opposed — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ALLIANCE v. RENAISSANCE ENTER
(Dec 1, 2005)