Defendant was convicted after trial and by guilty plea of separate counts of the same indictment. Since the record establishes a valid waiver of the right to appeal only with respect to the plea, but not as to the conviction after trial, we reach the merits of defendant's suppression claim.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Defendant was not arrested solely because of a description; rather, he was arrested because the victim pointed him out to the police who pursued and arrested him ( see e.g. People v. Rogers, 245 AD2d 395, lv denied 91 NY2d 1012). Although the police briefly lost sight of defendant, they immediately saw him again under circumstances providing no reason to doubt that he was the same person they had just been chasing.