PER CURIAM.
We affirm the appellant's judgment and sentence but remand for correction of a scrivener's error contained in the written judgment. See Diaz v. State, 910 So.2d 894 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (remanding for correction of scrivener's error in the judgment); Bolware v. State, 668 So.2d 200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (same). The judgment erroneously recites that the appellant was convicted of the sale of a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a school, when the appellant entered a plea to the lesser included offense of possession of cocaine. The judgment must be corrected to reflect the appellant's conviction for possession of cocaine, not the sale of a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a school.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.
WEBSTER, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ. concur.