Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

STATE v. CRESS.

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals' journal entry filed October 24, 2005:

"Does a criminal charge of intimidation in violation of R.C. 2921.04(B) require the state to prove that the defendant has made a threat to engage in unlawful conduct?"

PFEIFER, J., dissents.

The conflict cases are State v. Hoying, Greene App. No. 2004-CA-71, 2005-Ohio-1366, and State v. Lutz, Cuyahoga App. No. 80241, 2003-Ohio-275.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-1965, State v. Cress, Marion App. No. 9-04-42, 163 Ohio App.3d 46, 2005-Ohio-4620.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. CRESS
(Dec 28, 2005)