AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

LUC VETS DIAMANT, Plaintiff, v. DYNASTY DIAMOND JEWELRY GROUP CORP., Defendant.

ORDER

GEORGE DANIELS, District Judge

After entering a judgment of default in this action, the Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman for an inquest of damages. She issued a Report and Recommendation ("Report") recommending plaintiff be awarded $189,448.50 in damages, with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of 9% to be calculated from December 31, 2003. Magistrate Judge Freeman also recommended that plaintiff be awarded $4,860.15 in attorneys's fees and $365 in costs. In the Report, the magistrate judge advised the parties that failure to file timely objections will result in a waiver of objections and will preclude appellate review. No party filed objections to the Report and the time to do so has expired. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendation set forth within the Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where there are no objections, the Court may accept the Report provided there is no clear error on the face of the record. Nelson v. Smith, 618 F.Supp. 1186, 1189 (S.D.N.Y. 1985); see also Heisler v. Kralik, 981 F.Supp. 830, 840 (S.D.N.Y. 1997), aff'd sub nom. Heisler v. Rockland County, 164 F.3d 618 (2d Cir. 1998).

After reviewing the Report, the Court finds that the record is not facially erroneous. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report in its entirety and, for the reasons stated therein, the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment in accordance therewith.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DIAMANT v. DYNASTY DIAMOND JEWELRY GROUP CORP
(Jan 1, 2006)